// you’re reading...


Tea Party Congressman On Aurora Shootings: Why Didn’t Anyone Else In The Theater Have A Gun?

As long as some continue to believe that the 2nd Amendment is a sacrosanct right passed down to man by God, this kind of irrational thinking will continue. Though it is impossible to make sense of Representative Gohmert’s muddled thinking. Is he suggesting more God or more guns would have averted this massacre? And to even suggest that someone else in a dark and smoke filled theater should have opened up firing is pure madness as how many other innocent victims would have been caught up in the crossfire? And exactly how does Rep. Gohmert, a tea party favorite, know what motivated the shooter?

WASHINGTON — Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) said Friday that the shootings that took place in an Aurora, Colo. movie theater hours earlier were a result of “ongoing attacks on Judeo-Christian beliefs” and questioned why nobody else in the theater had a gun to take down the shooter.

During a radio interview on The Heritage Foundation’s “Istook Live!” show, Gohmert was asked why he believes such senseless acts of violence take place. Gohmert responded by talking about the weakening of Christian values in the country.

“You know what really gets me, as a Christian, is to see the ongoing attacks on Judeo-Christian beliefs, and then some senseless crazy act of a derelict takes place,” Gohmert said.

“Some of us happen to believe that when our founders talked about guarding our virtue and freedom, that that was important,” he said. “Whether it’s John Adams saying our Constitution was made only for moral and religious people … Ben Franklin, only a virtuous people are capable of freedom, as nations become corrupt and vicious they have more need of masters. We have been at war with the very pillars, the very foundation of this country.”

Ernest Istook, the host of the show and a former Oklahoma congressman, jumped in to clarify that nobody knows the motivation of the alleged Aurora gunman. Gohmert said that may be true, but suggested the shootings were still “a terrorist act” that could have been avoided if the country placed a higher value on God.

“People say … where was God in all of this?” Gohmert said. “We’ve threatened high school graduation participations, if they use God’s name, they’re going to be jailed … I mean that kind of stuff. Where was God? What have we done with God? We don’t want him around. I kind of like his protective hand being present.”

Gohmert also said the tragedy could have been lessened if someone else in the movie theater had been carrying a gun and took down the lone shooter. Istook noted that Colorado laws allow people to carry concealed guns.

“It does make me wonder, with all those people in the theater, was there nobody that was carrying a gun that could have stopped this guy more quickly?” he asked.

Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims’ families today.

The shooter, James Eagan Holmes, wore body armor. So more guns in the theater would likely not have stopped this mass murderer but instead would have led to more people being shot. As is, Holmes shot 71 people.


No comments for “Tea Party Congressman On Aurora Shootings: Why Didn’t Anyone Else In The Theater Have A Gun?”

Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed