Following withering cross-examination by Dean Masserman, the Judge concluded on page 72-73 of her ruling:

As the fact finder, this Court must make credibility determinations regarding testimony of the parties and other witnesses who testified at trial….After observing both Findley and Lee and carefully reviewing all the evidence at trial, this Court has serious concerns about Lee’s credibility, her failure to seek additional IVF treatments when she knew her marriage had ended, and her motive for seeking the Embryos in this case.

During her testimony, Lee was evasive, contradictory and admitted to providing prior testimony under penalty of perjury that was untrue.